Environment assignment 2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Environment assignment 2 - undertake ExampleThis would greatly reduce the ability of many firms in Botswana to achieve their goals, ultimately leading to displace GDP and increased poverty. d) Western governments can integrate HIV/AIDS in funding proposals so that they the Less Developed Countries (LDCs) can use these monies to boost their internal efforts in combating the spread and negative touch of AIDS. In addition to this the developed world could sponsor building of capacity in health institutions through training health practitioners on modern ways of tackling pandemics, overcoming stigma and promotion of safe sex campaigns. self-aggrandizing money alone to LDCs without the necessary human capacity to manage it well would be ineffective. Question 2 According to Kriebel et al. (2001) the preventative ruler consist of four central components taking preventive action in the face of uncertainty shifting the burden of proof to the proponents of an activity exploring a wide r ange of alternatives to mayhap harmful actions and increasing public participation in decision making. With this in mind, we agree that should one craving to introduce a new chemical or a new industrial process, he or she must demonstrate that their change will not harm the environment before proceeding. For starters, as it is immediately evident to the world, the pace of efforts to combat problems such as climate change, ecosystem degradation, and resource depletion is too slow and that environmental and health problems continue to grow more rapidly than societys ability to identify and comprise them. This therefore means that we cannot afford to compound these problems by every last(predicate)owing more untested products or processes to be started when we already have a backlog of issues to solve. Kriebel and Tickner (2001) concur with this argument when they state that the precautionary principle helps us to vitiate creating new problems as we solve the existing ones. By shi fting the burden of proof to proponents of an idea, the precautionary principle prevents the proponents from hurriedly investing in technologies or techniques for a quick buck. Proponents are forced to presuppose through all things that they may propose. This self-check mechanism is regulated from abuse by an increased stakeholder participation, which is advocated for by the precautionary principle. Question 3 In the most comprehensive, peer-reviewed and quantitative climate-health assessment to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) examined the global burden of disease already attributable to anthropogenic climate change up to the year 2000. The hold found that this global warming could already be causing over 150,000 deaths and approximately five one million million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per year through increasing incidences of diseases especially in developing countries (Patz, Campbell-Lendrum, Holloway, & Foley, 2005). This, however, does not advert th at the developed states are risk-free. On the contrary, large increases in heat waves (more devastating than the 2003 Europe heatwaves) have been communicate for the USA and European countries (Patz et al., 2005). On the other hand, global warming may not be all doom and gloom. According to What Are the Benefits of Global Warming?, (n.d.) global warming could increase the amount of commonwealth available by reducing the Polar Regions. This would lead to provision of more land for production of provender crops, crops to be used for generating alternative fuels and land for living. Others argue that it would