Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Reunion Essay

Reunion is a forgetful fabrication, written by butt Cheever. John William Cheever was an American short level author and novelist, who lived 70 days from May 27, 1912 to June 18, 1982. He is known worldwide as the Chekhov of the suburbs and for his umteen short stories and novels. 1 The short story Reunion, which I want to crush and interpret, was originally published in in 1962 in The New Yorker. 2 The schoolbook is a short act with a few(prenominal) persons, the environment is non-detailed and the story have one(a) conflict, which all be characterising a traditional short story.The story is round a boy named Charlie, who is traveling from his grandm new(prenominal)s in Adirondacks to a cottage on the Cape and is exit to be surrounded by trains for an hour and a half in New York. He grabs the opportunity to telephone his scram, who he had not earnn since his mother break him three years ago. As Charlie arrives to the dominating Central Station, he meets his missi ng scram, and in concert they walked on to a nearby eating house. Charlie was bright to finally capture his fuss, and as they walked together, Charlie regally treasured the whole world to see them.At the restaurant the stupefy could not execute himself because of his dissatisfaction with the service, and they finish up passing to go through at another restaurant. At the randomness restaurant they ordered a suck and where having a good epoch with separately other, but the good era ended early, once again because of the fathers mediocre behaviour. This time he was unsatisfied with the waiter, who did not wanted to give Charlie another drink, because of his age. They went to another restaurant again, where the father likewise started arguing with the waiter.They walked into the ordinal restaurant and the akin happened. All the restaurant trouble had made the time pass, and Charlie had to lucifer his train without a successfully restaurant visit. The father wante d to give Charlie a paper to read in the train, and at their instruction back to the station, they stopped by a newsstand. The father began discussing with the man at the newsstand, and Charlie ended up saying good-bye to his father to leave the station on the train, unhappy, disap trained and without any food or paper. The main characters in the story ar Charlie and his father.Charlie is a boy, who wishes to have a father to look up to and be proud of, but got the complete opposite. Charlie is under 21, because he cannot be served alcoholic drinks in the restaurant. From what Charlie tells in the beginning, we know that the father is big and good-looking. I think of him as a di di accent businessman with too many things going on at the same time and maybe a little deprave of alcohol. The reason to my thoughts is, that his wife disunite him, he have not had time to see his son since, his secretary is answering his cognitive contents and he cannot behave himself in the restau rants.In the story thither is a development mingled with the father and Charlie. To begin with their relationship is good and they are both happy to see to each one other. But as the fathers behaviour is getting worse throughout the story, Charlie begins to realise, that he feels disappointed and unhappy some his father and his behaviour. This negative development is distinctly shown at the end of the story, where Charlie ends up leaving his father with an empty feeling. The text is escaped to read and it is easy to understand the language.The fabricator is Charlie, and he tells the story from his own point of view. The story also tells near Charlies thoughts and feelings, for example his excitement and happiness approximately seeing his father in the beginning. The writer is also using direct speeches between the father and the divers(prenominal) waiters and Charlie to show and plunk for the fathers bad behaviour. The story takes place in New York, the States and the acti on takes place on the sniffy Central Station, the 4 restaurants, the streets they are manner of walking trough and the newsstand.The story is, like I said earlier, from 1962, but I think, that it is timeless, because it is a story, which could have happened today as well. I would even say, that the story fits 2013 better than 1962, because it is more than normal and frequent to be divorced and have a busy and stressed life. There are some different themes appearing in the story. One of the themes is stress. It is clear, that the father is very stressed about something. It could be his failed marriage, his job or just his risk about not being a good enough father to Charlie. That leads us to the next theme bad parenting.Charlie has not seen his father since the divorce three years ago, and that is of course not good parenting by neither of the parents. It is of course the fathers problem, but the mother could maybe also have had a bad work on in the situation. I think the both themes motivates a lot of each other. In this story stress leads to bad parenting. The fathers own life is stressed, and that is devising his behaviour to other throng bad. His bad behaviour to other the great unwashed is reservation him a bad parent, because Charlie obviously does not like being with his father, when he acts in that way.With these two themes, the main theme and the message of the story appears. I think, that John Cheever wants to remind people of the importance of treating other people in the same way, that you treat your closest friends and family. Because in the story it is the fathers bad treatment of other people that courses his bad relationship to his own son. That leads to the message no matter how busy and stressed you are, always remember to treat other people in the same way, that you allow treat your own family, or else you will loose the ones you care about.Reunion and life sentence with strangers have a lot of the same aspects. Living with stra ngers has a fibber, who describes the life in New York, where strangers does not care about you and are living their own stressed life. The narrator is from another culture, a smaller city, where it is normal to talk and care about other people, and she does not like the way the people of New York treats each other. The narrators situation is very standardized to the narrator in Reunion, Charlie, who does not like his fathers behaviour.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.